Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Oops, this was meant for the devel list, not the desktop list (though
it's definitely desktop relevant!)  I'll resend it there, and please
reply to the resend instead.

Thanks!
Owen
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:30 AM Owen Taylor <otaylor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> One of the key parts of making a decision to delay/skip F31 is
> figuring out, ahead of the decision, what the expected experience is
> for users and packagers. Does F30 have normal stability, or do we try
> to keep users happy by moving things forward with ad-hoc updates and
> cross-our-fingers and hope nothing breaks?
>
> I tend to think about this in terms of GNOME - would we rebase to
> GNOME 3.34 in the middle of F30 or not? But there's a lot of other
> pieces of software where similar considerations apply: container
> tools, cockpit, NetworkManager, etc.
>
> And if we did do updates like that, would we consider respinning media
> and making a "F30.1"?
>
> Owen
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux