On 03/16/2018 01:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: >> >> I'd appreciate a lot if people could give it a quick spin and see if >> they can find anything that looks like a regression compared to the >> stable F28 images, and then we can further discuss this at the blocker >> review meeting on Monday. > > The new version of Cantarell is, by its own authors admission, a > regression for all practical purposes: > > <madigens[m]> adamw: thanks for the feedback :) cantarell's spacing > does indeed look a bit funky... in gtk3 and firefox. that's due to a > missing technical detail called "subpixel positioning". Spacing looks > more consistent in Qt apps and Chrome. there also isn't any kerning > yet, so things like AVA, To, etc. look gap-y > > So, it looks fine...except in GTK+ 3 (i.e. basically all of > Workstation) and Firefox (Workstation's default browser). > > That seems like a problem. :P (Never mind that it just chucks out > Cyrillic coverage, which the previous version had). Can we consider > sticking with the old one at least until it's clear if this will be > cleaned up in time for Final? Fair enough, that's probably a prudent thing to do. I've split it out from the rest of the 3.28.0 update now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.101-1.fc28 -- Kalev _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
