Heya!
I don't think that leaving this default behaviour will do any good. First because suspending a live image doesn't makes much sense, second because if it doesn't work properly it will only cause problems and complaints, and last but not least, because people may get upset or confused when the live distro suspends after a relatively short time. I mean, if I wasn't aware of this behaviour and I would find it by the first time, I would think it a bug; and if it doesn't work properly I'll be upset.
I would rather prefer to prevent this scenario. Particularly because I don't see the benefits.
Maybe someone can throw some light? What are the benefits?
Regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On 9 March 2018 at 05:10, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi folks!
So, Fedora 28 has inherited an upstream GNOME change to default to
suspending after 20 minutes:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681869
I believe this will also apply to live images, unless we suppress it.
Should we suppress it? Suspending live images does not work well and
is, I think, expressly not really 'supported'.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
