Re: Release criteria proposals: Edition branding and installer customizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 11:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> sgallagh and I both noticed that the release criteria do not currently
> include any requirements around Edition branding or installer
> customizations. We think they probably should. Thus, we're proposing
> the following new criteria. They would be in a new section for each
> page, something like "Edition requirements" or something like that,
> probably with a brief explanation of what "Editions" are outside of any
> specific criterion text.
> 
> For Beta:
> 
> == Installer customization ==
> 
> For each Edition, all significant functional customization of installer
> behavior that are intended to be a part of that Edition must take
> effect on that Edition's installable release-blocking images.
> 
> footnote: 'Significant functional?': significant functional
> customization would usually include, for e.g., changes to the default
> filesystem and firewall configuration.

edit: firewall configuration isn't part of installer customization, in
fact. So let's drop that from the proposal and just leave 'changes to
the default filesystem'.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux