On Fri, Mar 10, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:38:29PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > * Atomic Host based Workstation next steps to align better with > > Colin's ostree work > > The current plan is to build Atomic Host from Base Runtime plus an > Atomic module. It would be nice for Atomic Workstation to be built from > Base Runtime + Atomic + Workstation modules. The term "module" here means yum/rpm-md repo right? In that case, sure. But I think "AtomicWS" shouldn't be considered derived at a binary or specification (i.e. rpm-ostree treefile) level from Atomic Host because the latter contains a bunch of server stuff such as ceph that doesn't make sense to be installed by default. (Well, except for the fact that libvirt currently drags in the entire world of storage) Another case is we're carrying duplicated etcd/kubernetes that won't be useful with `oc cluster up`. _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
