On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:56:05AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:15:41AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > * Was there general consensus this can be tuned per-edition by WG? > > I have the strong belief that it should be. This is one of the key > reasons to *have* separate editions. That said, I think we should > always look to make improvements globally when possible, and only make > them separate per-edition or per-spin when there's a compelling > difference for the respective use cases. Agreed, it wasn't clear to me whether anyone spoke to e.g. the Server WG about a general case for either the scheduler or systemd-readahead. > > * Any distinguishing Workstation features upcoming for F26/27 beyond > > Flatpak development? > > Specifically, we are looking for features which help drive our > marketing messages for Workstation's target audience. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
