Re: Workstation WG call for agenda 2016-Dec-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 11:50 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 17:03 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > That's misleading. Current behaviour of systemd-coredump is to store
> > the metadata in the journal, and the coredump on disk. Storing it in
> > the journal was rather inefficient, and we backed away from this. I
> > think saying "Core dumps will be processed by systemd-coredump and
> > information about core dumps will be stored in the journal" or
> > something along those lines would be better.
> 
> OK, I revised the change page to reflect this.
> 
> > > rather than created in the crashing process's current working
> > > directory by ABRT
> > 
> > Doesn't abrt store the coredumps in /var/tmp?
> 
> If you set ulimit it creates the core dumps in cwd. At least it did in
> F23; it's probably broken in F24 due to SELinux or systemd or something
> or other, but creating core dumps in cwd is definitely the previous and
> intended Fedora behavior.

So far as I've seen, it always stores them in /var/spool/abrt .
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux