Re: hibernation redux, possible blocker bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




----- Original Message -----
> Another hibernation bug came up for blocker review today.
> 
> systemd-logind does not verify if system has resume device defined
> when checking if can.hibernate or can.hybridsleep
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332266#c6
> 
> Converse to the description, the most compelling aspect is the
> screenshot in comment 6, in which GNOME shell puts up a notification
> stating that the system will hibernate soon. But of course that can't
> work on Fedora right now because the required command line
> "resume=<swap>" does not exist.
> 
> QA is right on the fence whether this behavior is sufficiently
> misleading and bad as to violate the data corruption/loss release
> criterion. In reality the system will merely be shutdown, so why not
> just say that?
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
> 
> Question for the WG is, is is possible to change
> /etc/UPower/UPower.conf such that
> - CriticalPowerAction=HybridSleep
> + CriticalPowerAction=PowerOff
> 
> That way the misleading message shouldn't happen?

Just papering over logind returning incorrect information? No.
And that breaks HybridSleep as well.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux