Status of developer assistant in Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi folks! So an F24 beta blocker was proposed today:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330941

because devassistant is not in F24 Workstation, and we have a criterion
requiring that all 'core applications' listed at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Technical_Specification#Core_Applications
must be present.

Now you might note that devassistant isn't in that now, so what's the
problem? It's not in it because I just took it out :)

https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Workstation/Technical_Specification&diff=444474&oldid=372102

There was a meeting last year where its removal was agreed by the WG:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/workstation/workstation.2015-11-25-15.00.log.html

but no-one updated the tech spec. There is an outstanding question,
however. It seemed from the meeting that people might want to keep
including the CLI, but in fact, the main 'devassistant' metapackage was
removed from comps:

https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/commit/?id=3ba95e811800f0dd548b4dfd53c7fcc4b8779667

so no part of DA is in current Workstation composes. I don't know if
you want to do anything about that. But I felt it was at least
sufficiently clear that DA was no longer considered a 'core
application' for Workstation and thus we don't need to block the Beta
on it not being present.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux