Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2016, 16:29 -0600 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 14:26 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Hi, > > there is currently a case against Firefox discussed in FESCo: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1518 > > We have many different opinions in this thread. Clearly, there is no > solution that will make everyone happy. I tried to formulate a > consensus position based on the comments in this thread, which I > suspect the majority of us can support: > > "Fedora Workstation prefers to ship the latest release of Firefox, > not > ESR releases. Shipping an unbranded version of Firefox is acceptable > to > us, but not ideal. Shipping a version of Firefox that blocks unsigned > extensions is also acceptable to us, but not ideal." > > In other words: we're fine with FESCo deciding for either unbranded > or > locked-down Firefox, but we won't be very happy either way. Does this > seem fair? > As long as there's no reliable data about how many users are affected by this issue IMHO the whole discussion is bulls**t. I's guess the majority of Firefox users get their addons from AMO and not from the Fedora repos and only a minority of users is affected by this issue. But that are only my 5 cent. BTW: An other interesting fact would be to know if other distributions got the same issue with Firefox and packaged addon and what's their solution. -- Regards, Heiko Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
