Hi, IMHO I say that Firefox lately gets problems, and we have better browsers in the repository already. We have Web, and pretty much usable. Zoltan 2016-01-07 14:29 GMT+01:00 Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx>: > ESR will only delay the problem. > > Can the Fedora build add a secodary key to accept signed extensions? > > AFAIK the long term plan is todeprecate the current method of extensions in > favour of a more browser agnostic approach. > > On 7 January 2016 at 13:26, Jiri Eischmann <eischmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> there is currently a case against Firefox discussed in FESCo: >> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1518 >> >> The problem in short: The last release of Firefox doesn't allow the >> user to install add-ons which are not signed by Mozilla by default, in >> the next version, you won't even be able to disable this behavior. This >> means that a couple of add-ons that are packaged by Fedora won't work. >> >> In my opinion, this problem has an impact on a relatively small number >> of users while suggested solutions will have an impact on majority of >> Workstation users. The author of the original ticket recommends Firefox >> is removed altogether if Mozilla doesn't change their plan, another >> suggestion is to switch to ESR which would mean that Fedora would have >> as conservative approach to Firefox updates as RHEL. >> >> Firefox is probably the most important desktop app in Fedora, so I >> wonder whether the Workstation working group should voice its opinion >> in this before any decision is made. >> >> Jiri >> -- >> desktop mailing list >> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- PGP: 06853DF7 -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
