-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/21/2015 05:36 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > Hi, due to previous efforts we have a pretty good appdata coverage > of apps themselves, but add-ons (plugins, extensions,...) lag far > behind. There are dozens of useful GUI app add-ons in Fedora > repositories which don't have metadata files and are not exposed to > users in GNOME Software. Let's focus on them. > > The goal of this iniciative is to have a metadata file for every > useful add-on (for a GUI app) that is in Fedora repositories, so > that those add-ons appear in app profiles in Software and are > easily discoverable and installable for users. > > For more information visit > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AddonAppdata I'd love to see more people attempting this. I started on a few of these a while ago, but got disheartened when I got responses like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267628#c2 when I provided patches. Richard, is there any way we can carry metadata like this outside of the actual SRPM when maintainers are unwilling to accept the metadata in their package? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZ4BygACgkQeiVVYja6o6Ns8ACfamaIe981Bw6FZzFtZhdqCLKV PL0AoIIp0J+08ANSya8yNZ9sr48gORiu =q6yR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
