On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Recommended reading: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1517 > > The original request to FESCo was for a decision on whether a package > built in COPR could `Requires: rpmfusion-foo` from RPMFusion. However, > with the new availability of weak dependencies, I've expanded the > discussion to include whether it would be acceptable in COPR or Fedora > proper to use `Recommends: rpmfusion-foo` or `Suggests: rpmfusion-foo`. > > If we decide that the weak dependencies are acceptable, this would > make it much easier for users to install codecs, etc. from RPMFusion > (always assuming of course that they are legally permitted to do so > wherever they are). In effect, it would become possible to do this > easily at install-time because just adding the RPMFusion repos > manually in the installer could then result in pulling in Recommended > codecs. > > I figure this is of particular interest to the Workstation SIG, so I'm > raising it here. Ha, I had the same thought and you've beat me to it. Well done. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
