On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 07:14:18PM -0500, Pete Travis wrote: [...snip...] > The productization of Fedora was purportedly aimed at enabling the project > to target user bases more specifically instead of trying to be everything > for everyone. The KDE folks have been refused Edition status at least > partially on the basis that Workstation is already the developer-targeting > product; meanwhile, the Workstation group seems to focus on content > creation and consumption, instead of technology development. I don't know > if there's a brand identity crisis, or if I'm just ignorant of the > Workstation goals, or have different connotations for terms like > 'developer' and 'workstation', or.... At the risk of being tiresome, I'd like to reiterate that content creation and consumption are not exclusive to non-developers. As has been said many times, "developers are people too," and they engage in many of the same activities as non-developers. The Workstation team is not focusing exclusively on these common activities, but you can't have an effective Workstation without them. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
