On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I will start with a TL;DR summary of my mail: we don't have to sandbox > our xdg-apps, like you say. But if we do, we should only allow running > sandboxed apps, even if it means we lose most of our apps. Otherwise, > the sandbox is pointless. It's a hard choice we'll need to make. Right > now, we're headed towards developing a useless sandbox, which is silly, > and it's time to apply the breaks and rethink that. Sigh. We're going to simply disagree on this point. I cannot agree with your black and white view on this. I understand your argumentation, but I think it's overly drastic and defeatist. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
