On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > - What are the next steps for Atomic Workstation? > > > > > > A decoder ring and a flow chart. > > > > Some links that may help: > > > > http://paul.frields.org/2015/04/02/fedora-under-construction/ > > > > Planning for an "Atomic Workstation": > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2015-July/012567.html > > > > http://videos.guadec.org/2015/Playing%20with%20apps%20in%20the%20sandbox/ > > > > There are also videos from the DevConf and Flock. > > > > Some documentation: > > > > Introduction to Linux Containers: > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/1353593 > > > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-atomic-getting-started > > > > I agree that it's not easy to grasp all of that directly, maybe you can > > try Docker or xdg-app (see how a container is built) to see how it works > > in practice. Once you're convinced about the benefits of containers, the > > Atomic Host is the next step. > > Also, to keep from causing more confusion, I've been calling this > "rpm-ostree based Workstation." Atomic Host is kind of its own thing > and probably a different release cycle than we're interested in. The > underlying tech is what we care about as far as Workstation is > concerned, but not something we necessarily want to push onto > end-users. Sorry, I meant *awareness of/concerns with that tech* isn't something we necessarily want to push onto end-users. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
