On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:34:10PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I didn't look at the code, but I was just playing with libpwquality > > a little bit, and it appears that a number of basic checks, like > > looking for palindromes, are actually disabled as part of disabling > > dictionary checks. That may or may not be what you want. An > > alternative to disabling dictionary checks would be to use a > > smaller dictionary - still restricting password, 123456, qwerty, > > and the like (I think it's reasonably argued that these would not > > be "great" at keeping out a human typing on they keyboard) > I think that's probably what we want. That's a little ambiguous. I'm assuming you're saying that the limited dictionary is what you want. I went ahead and filed <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246256>. (I think this'd be useful in general for anyone who wants this sort of policy.) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop