On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:28:12PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:22:24PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> > > ISTM we have a few contenders that are not yet listed in the proposed >> > > changes[1] list: >> > > * Integrating distro upgrade >> > Sadly, I don't have anybody free to work on this in the short term. We >> > can probably pick this up in August, but by then it may be too late for >> > F23. >> >> It certainly would be nice for upgrades to be testable by the alpha >> release, mid August, but maybe that could be pushed back to a beta >> target? Seems kind of risky. > > Given the Alpha freeze is end of July, that seems too late. I don't > like the idea of skirting deadlines to get something that's > historically touchy into a release at the last minute. I think what > Matthias is saying is F24 makes a better target here. That's fine; > I'm just looking to clarify. > >> What's the fallback option here? Find someone to keep FedUp working for >> one more release? > > Either that, or we have people resort only to something like > fedora-upgrade. Frankly, changing twice in the course of two releases > won't build user confidence, though. cc'ing wwoods to see what he > thinks. Well we could turn fedup into a script that runs the new dnf plugin under the hood to avoid that. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
