On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 12:25 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:28:12PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:22:24PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > ISTM we have a few contenders that are not yet listed in the > > > > proposed > > > > changes[1] list: > > > > * Integrating distro upgrade > > > Sadly, I don't have anybody free to work on this in the short > > > term. We > > > can probably pick this up in August, but by then it may be too > > > late for > > > F23. > > Wait, are we talking about integrating distro upgrade support into PackageKit/gnome-software, or into DNF itself? If the latter - i.e. there's nobody on the DNF team who will have time to work on integrating system-upgrade stuff - I'll happily volunteer to write patches... > > What's the fallback option here? Find someone to keep FedUp working > > for > > one more release? > > Either that, or we have people resort only to something like > fedora-upgrade. Frankly, changing twice in the course of two > releases > won't build user confidence, though. cc'ing wwoods to see what he > thinks. I really don't think it'd be hard to move dnf-plugins-fedup into DNF and/or dnf-plugins-core. It's really, really simple - like ~240 lines of code, most of which is implementing offline updates + plymouth output support. (for comparison, fedup-0.9.2 is ~2450 lines of code.) Also - doesn't fedora-upgrade require yum? Isn't that supposed to be deprecated? -w -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
