Re: Fedora 22 update security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Actually that should not an issue since we only do offline updates,
so there is no chance of one user updating software while
another is using it.

Christian



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" <desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 9:53:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 22 update security
> 
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > So I checked with Richard Hughes and the way the rules currently works is
> > that there is a difference between install and update. If you want to
> > install
> > a new piece of software you need to be part of the wheel group, but any
> > user can update already installed software as long as it is signed Fedora
> > software.
> > (Well technically they are not even doing that since updates are done
> > offline these
> > days).
> 
> Right, but that is the problem.  On a multi-user machine, allowing a
> non-admin user to update e.g. firefox can result in some very strange
> brokenness with currently running firefox instances.  Also, updates
> can bring incompatibilities with them and should be done by an admin.
> 
> I realize the rationale above is _mostly_ covering for inadequacies in
> application software but that is reality today.  However, even
> ignoring those issues, updates to core packages shouldn't be done by a
> non-admin user.
> 
> josh
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux