Re: Tweak Tool in Workstation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

hi
I haven't read all the comments here, I'm kinda jumping in the middle.
But from what I have read, it sounds more as if the OP wants tweak
tool functionality folded into gnome. I agree with this. Most of the
things tweak tool does are arguably things gnome itself should do. I
mean, seriously? To change what my power button does I have to launch
tweak tool? Why isn't this included in the power settings? That said,
I'm not picky. Gnome does all the basic stuff and some advanced stuff
from it's control center, and it integrates very very well, so I'm
fine with either decision. If tweak tool gets folded into gnome,
great. If not, I can just install it. What it does need is some a11y
love, but that's for a bug report, not here.
Thanks
Kendell clark
Sent from Fedora GNU/Linux


Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:18 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> Re: <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220007>;
>> 
>> There seem to be a bunch of users asking for inclusion of the
>> Tweak Tool in Workstation.
>> 
>> On the one hand, I'm not sure this is coming from a solid use
>> case perspective, beyond "I like to fiddle more settings in the
>> GUI than the standard GNOME Settings allow."  It seems to me that
>> if someone knows what they want to tweak at that level, it would
>> follow they're capable of installing a piece of software for
>> this.
>> 
>> On the other hand, this may be an opportunity to gather useful 
>> information on tweaks to GNOME.  It would be nice not to close
>> the BZ bug peremptorily.  We should consider the request
>> thoughtfully in the context of Workstation, and if possible, see
>> what information we can glean from the reporters or interested
>> parties, and see what action is worth taking.
> 
> I don't think that patching the control-center to launch the tweak 
> tool makes sense. That's entirely out of line with how the other 
> control-center panels work.
> 
> I don't have a problem with making the tweak tool easily
> available, but I have to wonder: are we failing so badly in our
> attempt to make software readily available via gnome-software and
> search that everything still has to be pre-installed ?
> 
> As an experiment, I removed gnome-tweak-tool and then I searched
> for 'tweak' in the shell overview - the tweak tool shows up among
> the search results provided by gnome-software, and it is 3 clicks
> from there to having it running (one to open gnome-software, one
> to install, one to launch).
> 
> Is that still too hard ?
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=xTQ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux