On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:48:56PM +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > I don't think we have the resources to please both those who want a > usable rolling release *and* those who want an LTS release. Making release-to-release upgrades more transparent seems like it'd help with both of these things, at least on a desktop. For an LTS server, one basically hopes to never apply updates ever. For a desktop, as long as the updates are hassle-free, as long as I don't have to spend a day on it (or significantly adjust my daily habits), LTS, rolling release, and twice-annual version bumps should basically be interchangeable. I just fedup'd my travel laptop, after doing it successfully on my desktop system, and while the first time went basically smoothly, on the second, the dash-to-dock extension isn't behaving right, and for some bizare reason the unicode symbol 🌐 comes out gigantic — like, multiple lines large. The extensions problem is, I know, hard to deal with, since it's third-party code. And I'll file a bug for the unicode thing — I dunno what's up with that. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
