----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:40 +0000, Allan Day wrote: > > So, key arguments: it's useful, in a good state, actively developed, > > and is increasingly integrated with the rest of the core utilities. > > One could argue that other apps that are not part of the default install > might fit in that description. I'm still having a hard time to find a > reason why a maps app specifically is important in the live image and > the default install in particular. Please, do give a list. > Also, it'd be nice to know what's the cost here, how many and which deps > and how much storage would we need in the image? Moot point, gnome-maps has been in the default install since F20. EOT -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
