On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 17:32 -0500, kendell clark wrote: > I'm not sure if qt-at-spi pulls in most of qt with it, and if so I > can see why it is not installed by default, but I don't believe it does It does bring in all of Qt, but we install both versions of Qt by default, so it doesn't matter. It looks like it's important to include this by default... but that's only worthwhile if it works out of the box, IMO. The shell script is included in the -doc subpackage. It looks like you're intended to manually install qt-at-spi-doc, then manually copy the shell script to the desired location. I'm going to venture that the package is not worth including by default if that step is required -- you already have to know a magic incantation to make it work, so installing it is hardly any extra challenge. Maybe there's a good reason for it to be this way -- does turning on accessibility in Qt have some sort of negative side-effect? -- but realistically the package is not usable for nontechnical users if that step is required. Hey Rex, what do you think we should do here? Michael -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
