On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 20:28 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Will they stay black and white? I use them for that reason. (Not > necessarily a default or anything I'm recommending, just my personal > style preference....) Yes, they're still black and white. It's just a somewhat different style. Proposed text: "App launchers MUST have a unique[3] launcher icon at least 128×128 in size with an alpha channel." Then in the second set of bullets: "Apps SHOULD include a scalable symbolic icon in a similar style to GNOME's symbolic app icons." I don't think it's reasonable to make the symbolic icon a MUST until we have symbolics for the current set of default apps. This is unfortunate because now that the app menu displays symbolics, it is highly-visible when some (most) apps use fallback hicolor icons there. It may have been a mistake to start using symbolics in the app menu, at least when so many GNOME apps are missing symbolics, let alone third-party apps. (It also might have been a genius way to encourage better high contrast coverage... time will tell.) (That proposed text also corrects a minor issue we discovered with the current wording, which technically mandates an exactly 128x128 icon even though that was surely not the intent of the rule. A 256x256 or 512x512 with no 128x128 should be sufficient; the GNOME HIG do not even recommend installing a 128x128 at all.) -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
