----- Original Message ----- > On 03/02/2015 08:47 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 20:22 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > >> For the past couple of releases we have defaulted to a Fedora > >> desktop background alongside the upstream GNOME lockscreen > >> wallpaper. I do like the upstream lock screen background, but I'd > >> prefer if it would match the desktop background by default, instead > >> of having two wallpapers that were clearly designed separately and > >> not intended to be used together. Any opposition to using the Fedora > >> background for the lock screen as well? This means the art would be > >> the same for both, unless the Fedora background folks come up with a > >> different wallpaper for the lock screen. > > I actually like the fact that the lock screen and the desktop are > > different. And I don't see what we would gain by making them the same, > > other than another round of fights. The default background has > > historically been a battleground in the fight over branding and > > identity. I think we could do with a cycle of no fight over background > > changes... > > > > > We discussed this in the design-team list, and IIRC, the concensus was > that for f22, we were going to create a complementary lock screen > wallpaper that is different from the main Fedora wallpaper, but a slight > variant. (similar to how the GNOME default lockscreen and wallpaper are) I'd say we could use it also for Plasma, is it going to be packaged in the standard backgrounds package? Jaroslav > > cheers > ryanlerch > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
