I was merely asking if this was intentional or an oversight. Or if I possibly completely misunderstood what could be the reason for the problem.
As soon as the signing problem with new packages has been solved (so that Yum will let me install), I will try again and file a bug if it is still reproducible. Currently I am on a snapshot 6 days old and cannot afford the time experimenting figuring out which new packages are signed and which are not.
-- Peter
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Peter Laursen <jazcyk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]I think you are shooting yourself in the foot by not allowing people to try F22 in VirtualBox etc.Mind your language, and always assume good intentions. Nobody explicitly decided to "not allow VirtualBox" and we are not "shooting ourselves in the foot".gdm should fallback to X11 when it can't use Wayland. If this fallback does not work, it is merely a bug that should be fixed. Why don't you start by filing it in GNOME's bugzilla?(besides new packets have arrived since yesterday that are not signed, it seems)I assume you mean packages. This is known and happens every time we branch, packages will be signed again in the time for alpha.
---Elad Alfassa.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
Hilsen / Regards
Peter Laursen
Peter Laursen
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
