On 19 January 2015 at 18:28, Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So my suggestion is that we have an initial discussion about this on the next workstation meeting and based on what we decide there I be happy > to start drafting some documents outlining how this could work. I think we really need to decide on a sliding scale of non-freeness and get some wording for each, For example: * Free, legally redistributable, but just not in Fedora proper, e.g. Chromium, various stuff in COPRs * Non-free but legally redistributable, e.g. Chrome * Bad combinations of licences, e.g. gstreamer-plugins-bad * Freely licensed but somehow legally encumbered, e.g. MP3 codec * Nonfree and legally encumbered, e.g. Skype IANAL, so the examples and scale are of course up for discussion. Richard -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
