Re: Workstation feedback on generic-release-workstation request?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 16:18:21 -0400,
 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 14:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154154 is a request to provide
a generic-release-workstation (sub)package in order to allow for
convenient remixing of a debranded Fedora Workstation.

It seemed odd that firewalld-config-workstation would require
system-release-workstation and if this were to be done we'd need to be
sure not to break Fedora composes. I was hoping to hear some comments
from the workstation group in the ticket.

firewalld-config-workstation requires system-release-workstation
specifically to enable the creation of generic-release-workstation
packages. (Both generic-release-workstation and
fedora-release-workstation would Provides: system-release-workstation)

I was thinking that that was probably the case with using system in the name. Though I was also wondering why the dependency was there at all. (Though that is moot if it is OK to add a generic version.)
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux