On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:25:46PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks. I'm checking the release criteria again for Fedora.next > compatibility, and there's an Alpha criterion with obvious issues: > > "Package sets > > When doing a graphical install using the dedicated installer images, the > installer must be able to install each of the release blocking desktops, > as well as the minimal package set. " > > This was obviously written to the world where we had generic installer > images - the DVD, and intentionally-generic netinsts. We do not have > those things any more. > > Do we want to dump this criterion entirely, or is there any of it we > would like to keep? For instance, would we consider it 'release > blocking' functionality for you to be able to do some/any of the above > from the Server and/or Workstation network install images *after > configuring the repos manually*? Particularly, the minimal installation? > I'm not sure F21 as currently conceived would offer an avenue for doing > an interactive minimal installation. > > Basically, it comes down to: do we want to have a blessed method for > doing a network install of KDE and/or minimal? If so, do we want to > block releases on it? Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the WS-specific netinst.iso allow you to install the standard Workstation product, among other things? I think I booted it the other day while redoing an installation, and saw multiple products available. I don't recall seeing Minimal but I didn't look specifically for it. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
