On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 16:14 +0100, Philip Whitehouse wrote: >> > Maybe we can target Fedora 22 for this then if necessary. The >> > original >> > bug was raised about 2 years ago, it's not going anywhere.. >> >> I agree. It's not a big deal. Why not leave this be for now, and revisit >> after F22 is released? > > > I really don't undertand why "not installing the release notes" is such a > big change we need to wait for the next cycle to implement. It's really just > a one line change. And if we want to install them but not provide a launcher > (so they could be opened by a bookmark in Firefox) than I'd happily provide > a patch to split the launcher to a subpackage. Yeah. Well I doubt that "release notes as a package" makes any sense. When I want to read the release notes of Fedora (or anything else) I just Google "Fedora 20 release notes" or "Firefox 31 release notes" ... I do not expect it to be in some package and I am pretty sure most use the web version anyway. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
