On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 12:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:52:54 +0100, MC (Milan) wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 07:23 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > > This is a dependency of deja-dup and seems to have silently obsoleted. >> > > Changelog shows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771299 as a >> > > pointer but it is unclear to me what am I supposed to do? >> > >> > Hi, >> > it was renamed to libgnome-keyring-devel, a note in the gnome-keyring >> > ChangeLog would work, as it was not obvious for me too. >> >> "Renamed"? If so, it would be just another example why our Package Renaming >> Process is flawed and only adds tiresome bureaucracy for those who follow it. >> >> This new package was introduced as a _conflicting_ package with a normal >> review request and without following: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process >> > > There's no renaming going on here, really. A package was split > (gnome-keyring calved libgnome-keyring as a separate module), and as a > consequence, gnome-keyring-devel became libgnome-keyring-devel. We could > have probably handled the transition better by adding a temporary > provides. Too late now. And / or announcing the change so people are aware of a change. Peter -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
