On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 18:33 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 17:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have started to build GNOME 3.1.4 updates for F16 on Monday. > > > Unfortunately, the branching cut in right between me building a > > > soname-bumping cogl and everything that depends on it. I have now > > > established a side target, f16-gnome, for building interdependent > > > updates without the forced wait due to updates-testing. I think I got > > > all cogl dependencies in the desktop rebuilt, and have filed a bodhi > > > update with all those builds. > > > > > > There is still more 3.1.4 updates to do, and I am going on vacation > > > tomorrow, so it would be great if other people (Richard, Tomas, Colin ?) > > > could chime in and get the remaining builds done. > > > > > > Don't forget that > > > a) you must switch to the f16 branch in git > > > b) we have to file bodhi updates for all F16 builds now > > > > Please try and file the Bodhi updates for *coherent groups of packages > > together*. This avoids the problem where we get some updates through but > > not the updates for other packages that depend on them, and so on. One > > update per package is not a good way to do it. Thanks! > > The mega update has the 'somebody always finds an issue' problem to ever > get sufficient karma... Well, groups of packages that together satisfy dependencies and will work independent of other updates is enough. We can manage the negative karma issue as well; if you have that problem, let me know, and I'll deal with it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
