On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 18:15 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:13:30PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > +# repoquery --whatrequires libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-python2-applet > > +# as of Fedora 15 20110428 > > +Obsoletes: gnome-python2-applet > > +Obsoletes: file-browser-applet > > +Obsoletes: glunarclock > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-bubblemon > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-cpufire > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-globalmenu > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-grandr > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-music > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-sensors > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-window-picker > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applets > > +Obsoletes: gnome-netstatus > > +Obsoletes: gnome-python2-applet > > +Obsoletes: gnubiff > > +Obsoletes: lock-keys-applet > > +Obsoletes: uim-gnome > > +Obsoletes: deskbar-applet > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-jalali-calendar > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-music > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-timer > > +Obsoletes: gnome-applets > > +Obsoletes: gnome-schedule > > +Obsoletes: hamster-applet > > +Obsoletes: x-tile > > Shouldn't these Obsoletes: be versioned just in case someone wants to > introduce a newer version of a package with the same name later? +1, obsoletes should *always* be versioned. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop