On 28 April 2011 09:57, Alexander Volovics <a.volovic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Though I don't feel happy about it at all. The developers are (and > have been) doing great work (the overall concept of gnome 3 is > innovative and promising) but are'nt they getting just a tiny bit > too authoritative and dictatorial: opensource should be about > freedom and choice. And the choice should not only be 'you can still > choose another window manager'. No. The freedom (and the choices you have therefrom) is about the code's license. How you run a specific project (i.e. what goes in the official source code tree) is a different thing. Most (every?) successful project runs some form of a meritocracy. Read on it. Rui -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
