On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:09 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is this development of other software, or development of Fedora? There > > are numerous packages and setups that make sense if you're a Fedora > > developer, less so if you're an upstream developer. Or does it not > > matter and we're talking about both? > > How do you differentiate a Fedora developer and an upstream developer? > I'm not sure being a Fedora developer is particularly interesting. > > I guess I don't think most people are interested in writing an OS. > But seems lots of people are interested in writing apps and dellvering > them to users. So I was referring to that: app development. And here > I'm not excluding web apps either. There is a strong case being made > for html5 as a development platform. > > Thanks, > Jon Fair enough. Being a Fedora developer involves pre-loading tools necessary to interact with the Fedora Infrastructure, and maybe even having a guided "get setup for Fedora development" document or wizard. Totally inappropriate for somebody who isn't going to be a Fedora packager. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) identi.ca (http://identi.ca/jkeating)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
