On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:31 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 01:50 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 20:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > > 'DE core functionality' sounds vague. At this point it might be more > > > honest to give up the term 'critical path' and just say that everything > > > on the desktop live image is considered 'important'. > > > > This isn't a replacement for the 'critical path', that will still exist > > as a separate concept which is used for other purposes, and it has its > > own clear definition. This is a new definition of an 'important' package > > set, which will be used for this updates testing purpose. > > Ah, ok. That makes more sense. But still, 'whats on the live cd' seems > like a reasonable approximation to repoclosure(core desktop + important > apps). I agree that the proposed wording is pretty vague, indeed, and should be much more precise. Perhaps ask Bill about this? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
