On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 21:11 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 24 March 2010 17:04, Nils Philippsen <nils@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No shit Sherlock. Did you for one second think about that simple-scan is > > far from being an xsane replacement? I doubt that simple-scan would let > > you scan&fax and I'd be most surprised if it were integrated into image > > manipulation apps like gimp. > > No, it's not a full featured scanning application. It's _simple_ scan, > and works a lot better than xsane for me, and I'm certainly not Aunt > Tilly. I fully agree to that (surprised?). If Colin hadn't removed xsane* from comps altogether I wouldn't have complained (and that's been amended), as I'm totally d'accord with casual users getting a simple to use scanning application. I would even say that people who need the versatility that xsane offers now deserve a better UI than what it currently has. Unfortunately nobody has gotten around to pimping xsane accordingly or writing a replacement yet, at least in FOSS circles. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nils@xxxxxxxxxx nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
