On 03/17/2010 09:26 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> The current DVD image is basically defined by comps and if you edit >> comps, you can control the result and since rel-eng does the compose, >> aren't they responsible for it? If not, how do we fix it? We cannot >> just ignore that experience. The desktop live image despite being the >> default doesn't cover a bunch of use cases (ability to select a >> different package set or even a different filesystem for example) and >> Mo's survey shows that the majority of users continue to download the >> DVD image and while taking the step of moving to a large image and >> offering a better out of box experience solves some of that, it doesn't >> make the proble go away. >> >> Alternatively, if noone is responsible for it, why are we still doing it? >> > Correction to above -- actually, direct download numbers I pull from > the HTTP logs show that the Desktop Live image far outnumber the DVD. > Mo's survey shows that the majority of respondents to her survey > continue to download the DVD image. :-) > Sorry but I don't see the correction. Aren't you agreeing with on Mo's survey? Rahul -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
