On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 22:22 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > Video codecs: no offer or mention of RPMfusion in contrast to competitors' > distros. (fails the apple.com/trailers test) Just replying to this one for now. The Fedora project cannot actually mention RPMFusion outside of how https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories is worded due to the type of content carried at RPMFusion and it's legality within the United States of America. Since Red Hat is a US headquartered company, and RHT has legal responsibility over Fedora, Fedora needs to abide by US law. It is unfortunate, but contributory infringement is a nasty issue to deal with :/ -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
