On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 16:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > this seems an appropriate topic for desktop-list... > > I don't think there is much to discuss, though. > > Yes, the missing abrt icon is a problem. But the fact that not every > item in Places and System has an icon was our design decision, and is > not a bug in any way. > > I don't see how those 'missing' icons could even theoretically be > considered a release blocker. They don't cause a problem in any way. I dunno, I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my question was more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it. Though looking at it again, it's a 'should' not a 'must' issue. Which by my understanding means it's not intended to actually be a blocker (only things on the release criteria page with the keyword 'must' indicate things we'd block for). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
