On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 08:48 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Matthias Clasen said the following on 10/20/2009 08:33 AM Pacific Time: > > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 08:06 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > > >> I think removing the hide desktop button is a really bad change too. I > >> also don't understand why these changes continue to pile on when we are > >> way past past alpha and feature freeze. These do not seem like "bug > >> fixes." Are more changes planned too? > >> > >> Is there a compelling reason (e.g. user interaction study, etc.) why > >> this change is being made and why it has to be made now? > > > > This change has to be made now because we want F12 to be as polished as > > it can be. Dropping dead and refraining from any further changes at beta > > time might be comforting to rel-eng and qa, but it is not conductive to > > getting the best release we can. > > > > I strongly deny that we have to provide a 'user interaction study' for > > every change we make. > > > > > > Please quote the section above where I said you "have to provide a user > interaction study." I still don't see the compelling reason for this > change beyond that you thought it should happen. Right, you didn't actually say that. I just read it that way. Sorry. > Is this an upstream decision or maybe you "are upstream"? I'm still > trying to understand how all this works :) There is no upstream in the default panel configuration - this has always been our own. Look for redhat-panel-default-setup.entries in our gnome-panel package. So yes, this is just our effort to come up with the best initial panel configuration for the desktop spin. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
