Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 14:07 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 12:31 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > Understood, but this is not really following the fhs. .pkla files are > > config files, so shouldn't they be in /etc? > > > > 'config file' is really a bit simplistic, and doesn't really describe > the situation adequately. Whether something is a config file or not > depends a lot on your role. As I mentioned earlier, we have a package > that installs files in /var/lib/polkit-1/localauthority/10-vendor.d, > those are certainly not config files in the sense that you as a local > administrator are supposed to edit them. Agreed, but I as the administrator would need to configure things in /var/lib/polkit-1 in order to customize the settings. This is usually done in /etc and called "configuration". > And 20-org.d, 30-site.d don't > really fit into the 'host-specific configuration data' bucket either. Not really sure about 20-org.d and 30-site.d because after reading the manpage I still don't fully understand the meanings of "the organization deploying the system" (GNOME, KDE, Xfce? My company?) and "site deploying the system" (what does "site" mean in this context?). Anyway, I think we both agree that 50-local.d definitely contains "host-specific configuration data", do we? Regards, Christoph -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
