On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Matthias Clasen<mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 14:09 -0400, Will Woods wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 12:49 -0400, Will Woods wrote: >> >> > On the downside, there's also no icons in Applications / Places / >> > System. So does Rawhide GNOME handle them differently? I can't imagine >> > that losing icons in the panel menu (or having them only in Places as >> > Johann describes) is the intended behavior. >> >> To answer my own question, here's the original bug report: >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557469 >> >> Comments there indicate that the Applications menu is still intended to >> have icons. The proposed guideline in comment #1 says (in part): >> >> "A menu item should have an icon only if it represents a dynamic object >> such as an application, file, device, or user ..." >> >> So yeah, that will probably be fixed once someone updates gnome-panel >> (or whatever component that menu comes from). >> > > The panel in rawhide has the intended behaviour. You get icons for > applications, files, devices, bookmarks, but not for categories, etc. > > The one potentially confusing thing here is that the panel menu icons > react to the settings at all (ie category icons come back if you turn > menu icons on). Maybe we want to stop them from doing that. Well, would it be possible to add a separate gconf key for it? I tested the "no icons mode" but well it looks like crap if you are used to the "icon mode". -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list