On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 11:26 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> It pulls the information from /etc/fedora-release - there's nothing to > >> do in plymouth itself. If your /etc/fedora-release comes from a correctly > >> rebranded package, the right thing should happen. > > > > Well, here is the thing. I run sed on /etc/fedora-release, I get a > > rebranded distro everywhere except for plymouth which already has picked > > up the name and won't let it go. Now I did replace fedora-release with > > my own foo-release but then I realized, I have to maintain my own > > repository now as well inorder to not break the upgrade path. I would > > like to avoid doing that by just not having Plymouth display that text > > at all. > > Running 'sed' on distribution provided files seems like a bad way > to go about it. What if fedora-release gets updated upstream? > > (That being said, you could certainly do a trigger to do the sed > at the right point after the package gets installed.) Don't encourage people to use triggers. That's like offering kids heroin. -sv -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
