Re: Plymouth and re-branding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
It pulls the information from /etc/fedora-release - there's nothing to
do in plymouth itself. If your /etc/fedora-release comes from a correctly
rebranded package, the right thing should happen.
Well, here is the thing. I run sed on /etc/fedora-release, I get a rebranded distro everywhere except for plymouth which already has picked up the name and won't let it go. Now I did replace fedora-release with my own foo-release but then I realized, I have to maintain my own repository now as well inorder to not break the upgrade path. I would like to avoid doing that by just not having Plymouth display that text at all.

Running 'sed' on distribution provided files seems like a bad way
to go about it. What if fedora-release gets updated upstream?

That has never happened really. I would like to avoid introducing my own packages into the compose as much as possible and this seems to be the best way to do it but I would take any good suggestions.

(That being said, you could certainly do a trigger to do the sed
at the right point after the package gets installed.)

I tried that and Plymouth still displays the old text when booting up as a live cd and only gets the new text, post installation. If you figure out a way to do it, let me know. I tried a few things and never managed to get it right.

Rahul

--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux