On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:25 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > > FWIW, I personally don't think any of these are good answers. Often I > think it would be useful if we had a good dictator to tell us what to do > (in the Linus is the dictator of the kernel way). It could work this way, at least for areas of influence. The Desktop SIG has essentially been given carte blanche over the (GNOME) Desktop experience, with the (minor/major) exception of the artwork. If the SIG so decides, they can elect or appoint said dictator who can make all these decisions. That's nearly how the release engineering team works, I'm a dictator however I do have people vote on issues mostly so that I can make sure that we've discussed things to a reasonable majority opinion before I dictate. It's not so much as voting as opinion polling. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list