Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 05:46:25PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 22:08 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote: >>> some of the compiz plugins will not work properly unless compiz is >>> started with the ccp plugin instead of glib/gconf. >> Sounds like those plugins are broken and need fixing ? > > Honestly I have no idea, other than seeing that people on the web as > well as most compiz/fusion tools seem to suggest doing so. > > If it's a bug then compiz & compiz-fusion are obviouly aware about it, > since they provide workaround in their tools (and with compiz & > compiz-fusion I mean core devs & community). And if they provide two > workarounds, then either the bug is currently too involved to be fixed > in a timely manner or it is not a bug but intended behaviour. > > In either case it would be nice to have Fedora work properly out of > the box. If it's a bug and does get fixed one day we can go back to > glib/gconf instead of ccp. Is there any reason otherwise not to just > patch gnome-wm to use ccp now? > I think that user settings will get left behind each time you switch between configuration backends. That's a big negative. A bugzilla report against the affected plugins will get some people looking at whether it's a bug in the plugin or not. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
