On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 15:25 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Regarding icons using different perspective, it is much worse for any > > theme especially when new applications do not have icons that follow > > either guideline (Blender, KOffice, xsane, about-me, gFTP, etc.) . > > I'm not quite groking this sentence. But at least for what > seems the majority of upstream GNOME apps these days, their > icons are based on the gnome-icon-theme/tango standards > which are flat or on the table perspectives. > > In the case of third party apps like blender, firefox, > thunderbird, etc, the majority of these icons tend to again > be a flat perspective. FWIW when I look at my nautilus desktop (with a functional gsf-office-thumbnailer installed from libgsf which may not be the default experience) I end up with a mixture of isometric echo icons for files that cannot be previewed and flat preview icons of ones that can be, e.g. .pdf, .odt, etc. which is somewhat unfortunate. Though that may more long-term suggest a need for a way to (hand-wavingly) consistently propagate a transformation for such previews than an argument against isometric icons. C. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
