On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:56 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > I'm less concerned about x86_64 for Beta, but i686 not fitting on a CD > is a stop ship. We're 43~megs over size. That's not a small amount. > This may have been brought up before, but I don't see archives of it so > it may have been IRC only. > > http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/alpha2beta-live-diff has a listing of > the package differences between Alpha and Beta. I would really > appreciate some help looking for something to cut for size, since you > guys are supposed to own this config now. > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spin-kickstarts.git;a=blob;f=fedora-live-base.ks;h=55f57cf0a7ebf60326c5eabf968b0d4b2dfd4975;hb=refs/heads/F-10-Beta > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spin-kickstarts.git;a=blob;f=fedora-livecd-desktop.ks;h=371ad17a34667b60fe0fab63a3e9876245c7da9e;hb=refs/heads/F-10-Beta > > and > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spin-kickstarts.git;a=blob;f=fedora-livecd-desktop-default.ks;h=e7a91937f1eb87df3d5197f6ea6cf2918ca986fb;hb=refs/heads/F-10-Beta > > are the configs used. Not that it's much by way of disk size, but it looks like a lot of the X libs got measurably bigger for no particularly good reason. libXrandr, for example, got almost 40% bigger purely because the ChangeLog in %doc got three times bigger. Do we care that much about including these? I can't see that they're worth much even on a real system. In related news, the rpm changelog for initscripts is over 100k and goes back to 1997, which does affect disk size since the live image includes a real rpmdb. glibc is even worse at about 120k, though it only goes back to 2000. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
